Talk:Apocalypse

Assessment

A - This article is considered an A-class article on the wiki quality scale

It reads "Apocalypse is the 2nd expansion for Stellaris", but shouldn't it be "4th"? ShiroSWR (talk) 12:08, 15 January 2018 (CET)

Well spotted. I've put in 'fourth' instead of the shorthand version too. Dauth (talk) 12:10, 15 January 2018 (CET)

Ok, in line with that, I have changed the numbering on the other 3 as well, so it is less confusing. ShiroSWR (talk) 15:38, 15 January 2018 (CET)

Dauth I placed 2nd because Leviathans and Synthetic Dawn were considered story packs and not full blown expansions, should we change them accordingly? KaTiON (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2018 (CET)

Nevermind, Shiro already done the work. KaTiON (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2018 (CET)

We should be consistent with the DLC page too. I don't mind which decision is made as long as its applied across the wiki. Dauth (talk) 16:34, 15 January 2018 (CET)

I also suggest that all names for Expansions etc are proper links, just the icon-as-link is a little inconvenient. Though that may or may not require a bit of an overhaul, so I am not sure if that is feasible. ShiroSWR (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2018 (CET)

[Unindented] I prefer to leave the distinction between the story-pack/expansion [and their numbering] as is. My main reason is that it makes it easier to follow PDX/devs announcements -- for example, the devs not referring to Res Publica as an expansion with EU4. I was thinking on changing the "flavor packs" section to the mini-expansion section on each wiki, but wanted to wait till there be more of them. Edit: Regarding the icon-link suggestion, icons double as links across all the wikis -- it has a stylistic and practical use -- so any user familiar with one wiki would know what to expect. ~ SolSys (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2018 (CET)